Another deliciously fact-filled, juicy detailed book about some of the brattiest figures in history. (I can't wait to review this for you very soon.) One of these is the infamous Pauline Bonaparte...she sure was one piece of work!
What could be better than a tantalizing post to set the pace for Royal Pain
PAULINE AND JOSEPHINE:
RIVALS FOR NAPOLEON’S LOVE
Two striking brunettes: each barely educated in the traditional sense, each captivating in her own way. And each one in love with the same man—Napoleon Bonaparte—except that one was his wife, the former Josephine (Rose) de Beauharnais, and the other was his spirited younger sister, Pauline.
In the spring of 1796, Napoleon, having just wed Josephine, was appointed Commander of the Interior and was given command of the French army in
At the age of fifteen the precocious Pauline, twelve years her brother’s junior, had developed a raging crush on a much older man, the rakish Stanislaus Fréron, but Fréron already had a mistress who had given him two children, with another on the way, and Napoleon refused to allow his sister to wed him.
Not long after that, Pauline was caught canoodling with one of her brother’s officers, Adjutant General Victor Emmanuel Leclerc, in his mid-twenties, dashing, chiseled, and nicknamed “the blond Napoleon.” The real Napoleon, who was quite a prude when it came to other people’s sex lives, insisted that they marry.
Not long after that, Pauline was caught canoodling with one of her brother’s officers, Adjutant General Victor Emmanuel Leclerc, in his mid-twenties, dashing, chiseled, and nicknamed “the blond Napoleon.” The real Napoleon, who was quite a prude when it came to other people’s sex lives, insisted that they marry.
They wed in 1797; and in April 1798 Pauline bore Leclerc a son. Napoleon chose the boy’s name, Dermide, after the hero in one of his favorite poems. In 1801 Leclerc was posted to Saint-Domingue to quash a slave revolt. He proved a valiant commander, but Pauline proved unfaithful. News of her libidinous antics reached her brother in Europe and she received a long-distance scolding; her behavior was becoming an embarrassment to him.
Leclerc died of Yellow Fever and although Pauline ostentatiously mourned him, she wasted little time in returning to her social whirl on the Continent. In 1803 she married the doltish Roman prince Camillo Borghese, becoming a genuine princess. It was a defining moment for her, the chance to flaunt her title, lording it over her other sisters. Having secretly wed Camillo before the date agreed upon with Napoleon, she angered him when she was announced as the Princess Borghese at one of his soirees. But he could not remain angry with her for long. In fact he was forever forgiving her transgressions of etiquette and her general rudeness, even to Josephine, because the pair of them shared a special bond.
Of her rivalry with Josephine, she always referred to Napoleon’s wife as “the old woman,” as Josephine was six years older than her husband. And little Dermide’s death in the summer of 1804 (as a consequence of Camillo’s brother’s neglect) had made Pauline even more self-centered. She initially refused to attend Napoleon’s coronation in December, 1804, primarily because she and her sisters were expected to act as train bearers for the detested Josephine as she was crowned empress. It was only after Dermide was laid to rest and one of her sisters sent her a sample of the latest fashion in court dresses (which was too delectably resplendent for Pauline to resist for very long), that she decided to put in an appearance at the coronation after all. She recast herself as Napoleon’s greatest supporter, averring, “He is my protector, he will defend me against the evil designs of my husband.”
The emperor was forever scolding Pauline about her promiscuity, but she laughed it off—even at peril to her health. She developed a disease of the fallopian tubes, which her doctors attributed to furor uterinis, or an overuse of her nether parts, and she often had to be carried about; but nothing curbed her oversize libido, which was very much like her older brother’s.
Josephine, too, considered her jealous sister-in-law a nymphomaniac—among other things. She’d harbored her suspicions about the nature of Pauline’s relationship with her husband for some time, but one evening at Malmaison during the winter of 1805-06, after a dinner among family members and friends, she approached one of her usual confidants, the philosopher Constantin-François Chassebœuf, Comte Volney, in tears, exclaiming that she was “wretched indeed. You don’t know what I have just seen,” she told the count, who was accustomed to offering the empress a shoulder to cry on whenever she discovered Napoleon’s latest marital infidelity. “The Emperor is a scoundrel,” she continued. “I have just caught him in Pauline’s arms. Do you hear! In his sister Pauline’s arms!”
As I mention in my chapter on Pauline in ROYAL PAINS: A Rogues Gallery of Brats, Brutes, and Bad Seeds
(NAL: March, 2011), allegations of incest between Napoleon and Pauline were not entirely improbable. Josephine’s outburst to Comte Volney was not the first time she had expressed the view that her husband and his sister had an inappropriately intimate relationship. The American diplomat Gouverneur Morris had also heard the rumors, and characterized “the present Princess Borghese” as “a Messalina.” Messalina was the wife of the emperor Claudius who reputedly competed with a renowned prostitute to see who could bed more lovers in a single night. When confronted with Josephine’s suspicion via a third party, Pauline at first denied any such impropriety, insisting that “. . . the Empress was no better than she should be herself. At length she acknowledged it.”
Of course Pauline loved the limelight, and negative attention was still attention, but considering the size of her sexual appetite, which was even outmatched by Napoleon’s libido, an incestuous relationship between the siblings is certainly plausible, given their personalities. Pauline’s recent biographer, historian Flora Fraser, has arrived at the same conclusion, stating that “the truth is, it seems almost inevitable, given the strong sex drive for which Pauline and Napoleon were both renowned,” and for “their mutual affection” and “clannish affinity,” as well as their blasé attitude toward their sexual conquests. Not only that, coming from Corsica where intermarriage among relatives was common, they had a different cultural outlook on incest.
Whether or not it was true that they were lovers, Pauline loved to shock and titillate people, and flaunted her closeness to the emperor and the odd sort of power that she alone of all her siblings wielded over the most powerful man on earth.
So—do you believe that Pauline Bonaparte and her brother had an incestuous relationship? Do you think Josephine had due cause for suspicion?
And now, there's more! Leslie is graciously offering a Signed Copy of Royal Pains to one of my lucky followers! Thank you So Much:)To Enter:
1)You must Be a Follower of this blog
2) Answer Leslie's Guest Post Question
Open to US and Canada only
Winner announced on March 13th
Good Luck!










17 comments:
I remember Madame Delors discussed this issue at Versailles and More- but she was skeptical of the incest theory:
http://blog.catherinedelors.com/a-biography-of-pauline-bonaparte-by-flora-fraser/
Wow...this book looks amazing! I had never heard this incest theory, but I'm sure that it could have been possible. And, now that I've come across the theory, and see that there is a book which mentions it, I am determined to learn more about it!
I am a blog follower!
kimbers10[at]yahoo[dot]com
I would tend to doubt the incest, although I certainly believe Josephine had reason to be jealous of Napoleon's devotion to Pauline.
Thanks for the giveaway. And I am a follower.
lcbrower40(at)gmail(dot)com
I think it could have been possible for them to have an incestuous relationship but I think it's a little far fetched. However, I think Josephine had reason to worry and be jealous.
I'm a follower
taylor_ward11@yahoo.com
Wonderful post. Thank you. I read a few months ago the biography of Pauline by Flora Fraser and adored it. HEARTILY recommend it, too. Anytime someone can create marvelous prose from historical fact and keep you intrigued, you know you have a superb writer.
(CLEOPATRA by Stacy Shiff is also at the tip top of my list for such bios.)
Ciao!
I just read a book centered around Pauline and her second marriage and the book took the stance that Pauline found her brother to be overbearing and controlling. While it is of course possible I just have a hard time believing they had an incestuous relationship. He seemed to have held his family members to a much higher standard morally.
I am a GFC follower (Colleen Turner).
Having just finished The Princess of Nowhere, I believe Napoleon and Pauline had a very special relationship - something like the relationship between Anne Boleyn and her brother George. I don't think there was any sexual intimacy there, but rather a deep-rooted attachment that to outsiders may have looked incestuous. Pauline surely had no shortage of lovers. Thanks so much for the giveaway! I love all of Leslie's books!
I am a follower.
Amy
tiger_fan_1997 AT yahoo DOT com
This is the first I have heard of this possibility. I must admit to limited knowledge of this time period in history. Given the general feelings towards incest I doubt they took it that far.
thanks for the giveaway
kaiminani at gmail dot com
Hmmm...that's a good question. While it's inconceivable for us to imagine such a relationship, it was acceptable in their culture. But I think they had a special, close relationship that Josephine was jealous of. Maybe Josephine spread the rumors to turn people against Pauline.
I'm a GFC follower: Michele
rlawrence110 at yahoo dot com
I think that they had a special relationship that might have caused tongues to wag, especially if those tongues happened to be jealous. I don't think it was necessarily an incestuous sexual relationship, but a close sibling bond that isn't as limited, physically, as the "typical" sibling pair. An above commenter brought up George and Anne Boleyn, which I think is an apt comparison. Perhaps Josephine really did see them laying together, but the reasoning wasn't sex, but simply the natural physical closeness that they both desired.
I'm a (new!) follower! vivelaqueen [at] yahoo.com
I am not sure if the incest relationship is true but I think it is entirely possible. As they say truth is stranger than fiction.
Laura
laura.leahj@ gmail dot com
I think it's entirely possible that they did have an incestuous relationship. marcie.turner@yahoo.com
Wow...I've never read that about Napoleon and Pauline...but it would not surprise me in the least if it was true since we seem to read alot about incestuous relationships back in the day ;) Oh yeah I'm a follower and now I'm off to add this giveaway to my sidebar. 13 is after all, my lucky number ;) Lovely guest post and would love to read more. Fondly, Roberta
Waaaaa! I just wrote out a long response and Blogger ATE it! I just got Leslie's book in the mail and I cannot wait to read it!
I've been having such fun reading these spirited comments, fascinated that the trope began with a spate of "oh, no, they could never!" and then arced into "well ... they might have!"
I think it's so difficult for 21st-century sensibilities, especially American sensibilities, where many readers are still creeped out about the idea of first cousins marrying, when in fact that was practically the norm among western royalty for centuries (look at Victoria and Albert, for example), that we can't even consider the question of incest. And when it may pertain to some of our favorite historical personages, we just don't want to go there.
But 18th-century Corsica culturally, as Flora Fraser (Pauline Bonaparte's most recent biographer) points out, was very different from our own culture, so we need to adjust our barometers to accommodate that. And we also must consider Napoleon and Pauline's specific personality traits, which included large doses of megalomania and nymphomania. Frankly, I'd be willing to bet that even if they never had an actual full-blown affair that they might have "experimented," -- being the types to try just about anything heterosexual at least once. And they did love each other very deeply and were indeed sexually attracted to each other.
Thank you to everyone who posted a comment! As we will never know the truth about Napoleon and Pauline, your hunches and conjectures, along with poor Josephine's, may remain among history's unsolved mysteries.
I don't believe there was an incestuous relationship between Pauline and Napoleon.
I'm a follower- thanks for the giveaway!
Rachelhwallen@gmail.com
Post a Comment